| Last Updated: Aug 6, 2010 - 1:11:39 PM |
Thakur, Reister, and Hatch 6 carried out extensive field evaluation on all three light-scattering instruments, namely, SIMSLIN, GCA RAM-1, and the Tyndallometer. Main defects that disqualified them as a dust monitoring device for compliance with the law were as follows: 1. (2) Classroom and field recertification is conducted by a “C” Certifier, who also retains authority to sign field evaluation forms and wallet cards. However, the classroom instruction may be delegated to a qualified “C” sawyer by direction of the “C” Certifier.
Field Evaluation - Bear Archery® Truth 2 By Keith Dunlap - Field Evaluator Aug 19, 2008 - 10:45:13 PM |
- The first is the definition of the typical field infiltration relationship using the evaluation data describing the surface flow. The mathematical basis of the infiltration analysis will be the extended form of the Kostiakov-Lewis formula (Eq. The second is the evaluation of the efficiency of the irrigation event studied.
- Field Grade Form MAJ/LTC; CW3-CW5 Page 1. Administrative data remains consist with the CO Grade evaluation. Raters have the opportunity to comment on possible broadening and operational assignments Attribute of Character is highlighted on the Field Grade Form.
- This Evaluation Form is ONLY For: Full time Program Students in Year #2. Accelerated Program Students in Year #2. OYR Program Time Frame II Students in. Semester of field. Dual Degree/Bank Street Program Students in. Semester of field FIELD INSTRUCTORS: Please complete this evaluation form with your student.
In this field evaluation, we will take a close look at the Bear Archery 'The Truth 2'; a bow that Bear Archery claims raises the bar again for performance that is well above the price.
| 'The Truth 2' from Bear Archery. |
Truth 2 Basics
Riser:
The riser on the Truth 2 is a CNC machined 6061-T6 aluminum extrusion. The engineers at Bear Archery wanted a straighter, less reflexed, riser. They've accomplished just that as the Truth 2 riser is reflexed a mere one-inch. Many compound bows have a reflex geometry between two and four inches. What does this mean to you? Reflex and deflex are terms used to explain the geometry of a riser. A deflex riser bow will generally have a higher brace height than a reflex riser bow. A reflex riser bow normally has a shorter brace height, but increased speed. Reflex/deflex is measured by the position of the throat of the grip in terms of its location from a line drawn from each of the pocket pivot points to the grip. If the throat of the grip is in front of the pivot point line it is considered deflex, if it is behind the pivot point line it is considered reflex. By minimizing the reflex, the Truth 2 engineers have created an accurate bow that is both fast, and more forgiving.
| Dual Arc String Suppressors. |
Limbs/Limb Pockets:
The 'compression molded flare quad' split limbs of the Truth 2 were designed to increase efficiency by spreading the stress evenly over the entire limb (see figure 4 below). This also allows the fiberglass limbs to bend farther, to a beyond-parallel position at full draw. The Truth 2 has a seven-inch brace height and relatively compact profile. This should make for a good hunting rig.
Eccentric System:
Bear Archery equipped the Truth 2 with their Perimeter-Weighted Modular Single Cam. Designed with a large diameter, the cam system rotates on a sealed, stainless steel ball bearing and includes an asymmetric power track to reduce friction and increase cable life. The asymmetric cable groove works with the natural tensions inherent to the cam system and allows the cable to be easily pulled and laid back into the groove. This system is advertised to generate IBO speeds of 314 to 318 feet per second.
Silencing System:
Bear Archery's new Dual Arc String Suppression system (see figure 2 above) includes two riser mounted arms that curve back toward the string with two crab claw shaped dampers made of a proprietary rubber material. Axle-mounted weighted dampeners are positioned on the limb tips for additional vibration absorption.
Testing:
Out of the box, I quickly recognized the signature colors of Bear Archery…the green anodized eccentrics and limb pockets with laser engraved company logo laser, the orange Bear logo overmold grip, and the green and orange string and cable from Winner's Choice. Add to these features the Realtree APG film dip finish on the riser and limbs, and this is one eye-catching bow, and one that I recognize well from the PRIMOS hunting videos.
My evaluation began with a thorough visual examination of the Truth 2 for any workmanship quality issues or defects. Upon inspection, I found no visible defects. The eccentrics moved freely when pressure was removed from the strings and cables. All parts fit together perfectly, nothing was loose, and the bow was mechanically sound. I would expect this type of quality workmanship from Bear Archery.
I
| Modules provide 24-30' draw lengths with 1/2-inch adjustment posts located on the cam. |
Initial Setup:
Items added to the bow for my evaluation included: Trophy Ridge DropZone fall-away arrow rest; Spot Hogg Real Deal site; a G5 Meta ¼' peep; and a D-loop. I selected 350-grain Carbon Express Maxima 350 arrows for my evaluation. I performed the usual initial setup to ensure that my nocking point and rest were properly adjusted and I tuned the center shot using my Easy Eye Laser Eze-Center Gauge. Next, the Truth 2 was paper tuned and ready to put to the test.
Comfort of shooting bow:
When shooting the Truth 2, it became obvious that Bear Archery has developed a product that really provides a quiet shot with ease and comfort. Starting with the grip design, the Truth 2 was very comfortable to grip using my straight-wristed style of gripping a bow. The one-piece synthetic bow grip rested well in my hand. I like a thin grip to reduce the possibility of hand torque, and to this end I found the Truth 2 grip adequate. Additionally, the synthetic material will provide a warmer feel during cold weather hunting.
I shot sets of 30 arrows each day for a week to evaluate overall comfort, draw cycle, shock, vibration and torque. Additionally, I shot three other bows I had on hand for comparative purposes throughout the evaluation.
The Truth 2 is very impressive when it comes to comfort and 'shootability'. I found this bow to be a pleasure to shoot throughout my evaluation. The draw cycle was very smooth and consistent throughout the draw…no major inclines or declines in the draw curve. Often bows that generate the kind speed that the Truth 2 generates will have a difficult draw curve, but not so with the Truth
2. The draw cycle is smooth and this bow generates plenty of speed.
My next area of focus was to concentrate on the amount of shock and/or vibration felt during each shot. This one is tough to measure other than feel or the amount of 'jump' felt upon release of the string. You should really compare the bow you are evaluating to other bows on the market to really feel the difference. A visit to the local archery shop should provide a good comparison. After shooting the Truth 2 for a week and comparing it with the other bows in my shop, I can tell you that the Truth 2 really does back up its claim to be superior in comfort and performance. I felt very little 'jump' when I released the string, and the Truth 2 was one of the smoothest shooting bows of the several I shot during my evaluation.
| Compression Molded Flare Quad limbs. |
Speed:
The Truth 2 that I evaluated had a measured peak draw weight of 70.1 lbs and a measured draw length of 29.1 inches. Speed was measured on a Pro Chrono chronograph. I measured 18 shots and averaged the results. The average speed of the 350-grain CE Maxima arrows as they flew from the Truth 2 was 304 fps. For comparative purposes, I then measured 18 shots with one of my 376-grain CE Maxima hunting arrows. The speed dropped to 293 fps with the heavier arrow. Under the I.B.O. (International Bowhunter's Organization) standard, speed is measured using a bow with a draw weight of 70 lbs, a draw length of 30 inches, and the arrow should have a grain weight of 350 (or 5 grains of arrow weight per pound of bow weight). In my opinion, the Truth 2 speed measurement of 306 fps with the 350-grain arrow and the shorter draw length of 29.1 inches is within range of the advertised IBO speed of 314-318 fps if the draw length were increased to 30 inches.
Maneuverability:
I evaluated maneuverability by shooting the Truth 2 from various positions in a ground blind and from a tree stand. I took several shots seated, kneeling, and standing from within the ground blind and from a tree stand. The Truth 2 has a 33' axle-to-axle, and I found it to be very maneuverable in real hunting situations.
Noise level:
The proper method to evaluate noise level would be to use a decibel meter capable of measuring low noise levels. I don't have access to one, so in order to evaluate the noise level of this Truth 2 bow; I blindfolded a few family members and my hunting friends and had them listen next to me while I shot various bows in our indoor target range. In order to complete this part of my evaluation, I removed all accessories that I had previously added to the bow to replicate 'out-of-the-box' conditions. I shot one arrow from each of four bows in their 'out-of-the-box' condition, including the Truth 2, and recorded the reactions of each person in succession. I repeated this test ten times until I was able to average the results. The Truth 2 was voted the second quietest bow that I shot according to each person helping me with this test. It is worth noting that there was not a significant difference between the first place and second place bows. I found the low noise level during the shot to be one of the better that I've experienced.
The Truth 2 is an excellent bow from axle to axle. I found this bow to be one of the most comfortable bows I have evaluated. The hand shock and overall vibration during the shot is minimal. The speed of this bow is above average for the price range, and the draw cycle is smooth.
| The real fun comes in shooting the Bear Truth 2. |
Rating Chart:
This rating chart is intended to help you investigate a single bow by reviewing its key features, and also compare it to other models you may be interested in. A rating system of 1 through 10, in ½ point increments, will be used with 1 being the lowest and 10 the highest or best.
Following is a list of the bow properties that will be covered and their definitions.
1. Grip: This item will be rated on its 'feel' and shape in regard to the effect it has on torque and the overall enjoyment of shooting.
2. Maneuverability: This rating is self-explanatory and will be determined through various field tests, including ground blinds and treestands. Mass weight will also be a factor.
3. Speed: The rating for this category will be based on the design and intended purpose of the bow. For example, if the bow being tested is a youth model, it will not be expected to spit arrows out at 300+ fps.
4. Quality/Workmanship: Again, self-explanatory. This item will be based on attention to detail in the areas of machining, finish, and general mechanics.
5. Shock and Vibration: Ratings will be based on the amount of 'jump' felt upon release.
6. Noise Level: Noise will be rated without any noise dampening devices installed. This will allow the test to be based solely on the bow's out-of-the-box performance. This category is closely related to that of the shock and vibration category.
7. Draw Cycle 'feel': The perceived smoothness of the draw is the focus of this rating.
8. Shootability: Many factors come into play here, including axle-to-axle length, brace height, and eccentrics.
9. Advantage: What makes this bow special? Why choose this bow over another?
Category - Rating - Comments
- Grip - 8.5 (I prefer super thin wood grips)
- Maneuverability - 10
- Speed - 9.0
- Quality/Workmanship - 10
- Shock/Vibration - 9.5
- Noise Level - 9.0
- Draw Cycle 'feel' - 10 (gentle climb to the top, easy over to holding weight)
- Shootability - 10 (very good performance)
- Advantage - 9.0 (excellent value)
- Average Score - 9.4 out of possible 10
- Total Score - 85 out of possible 90
Pros: Great value, ample speed, quiet, comfortable to shoot
Field 2 Evaluation Process
Cons: Rubber material used for the Dual Arc string suppressors show wear rather quickly.
Spec Sheet:
- Draw weights: 60 or 70 pounds peak (70.1 lbs. as tested)
- Draw Lengths: 24-30 inches
- Axle-to-axle length: 33 inches
- Brace Height: 7 inches
- Mass Weight: 3.9 lbs
- Let-off: 80%
- Grip: Bear Logo Overmold one-piece
- Eccentric System: Perimeter-Weighted Modular Single Cam
- Advertised IBO speed: 314-318 fps (70 lbs, 30' draw, 350 grain arrow)
- Finish: Realtree APG
- Cable: Winner's Choice, 20 strand, 94 1/16 inches
- String: Winner's Choice, 20 strand, 35 1/8 inches
- Riser: CNC Machined 6061-T6 aluminum extrusion
- Limbs: Compression Molded Flare Quad
- Cable guard: Carbon
- Silencing System: Dual Arc string suppressors
- MSRP: $649
- Warranty: Limited lifetime to original owner
For More Visit: Bear Archery
© Copyright1996 - 2010 by Bowhunting.net
What are self-evaluations and why are they important?
Self-evaluations, also called self-performance reviews, are an appraisal of a person’s own strengths and weaknesses.
When people complete self-evaluations, they’re usually asked to identify achievements they’re proud of, instances when they met or exceeded their goals, examples of how they expanded their skill set and areas where they may need to advance their skills further. Generally, these assessments cover a specific performance review period, such as a quarter or a year.
A self-evaluation has multiple advantages for both employees and employers:
- It allows employees to demonstrate their accomplishments. It’s essential that employees have an opportunity to share some of their favorite achievements, such as a challenging project they completed or how they’ve helped the team or organization meet specific goals and objectives. Highlighting these accomplishments helps employees feel recognized for their efforts and gives them insight into the types of work they find most fulfilling.
- It helps managers stay informed about their employees’ strengths and achievements. Leaders aren’t always aware of all the contributions each employee makes to the team’s success. It can also be challenging to remember individual accomplishments, especially those that happened several weeks or months in the past. Asking employees to cite their achievements helps managers stay aware of each team member’s strengths, skills and the value they provide.
- It motivates employees to take ownership of their strengths and weaknesses. When an employee reflects on the work they’ve completed over a specific period, they become more aware of where they’re most successful and which areas need improvement. Taking time for reflection can help team members find new opportunities to apply their best strengths while also identifying where they may need to focus their skill-building efforts. For example, they may find new uses for existing talents, or they may recognize how a lack of skills in a certain area is preventing them from maximizing their efficiency.
- It helps to quantify the value an employee offers. Performance reviews are an excellent time to reassess an employees’ compensation and career trajectory and determine whether they’ve earned a raise or promotion. Self-evaluations prompt employees to pinpoint exactly how they add value to the organization and whether or not they’ve demonstrated the skills necessary to take on additional responsibilities. This can help set better expectations around whether or not an employee has qualified for a pay increase or a more senior role.
Tips for effective self-evaluations
A self-assessment is only as powerful as the process behind it. In other words, it’s essential you give employees clear guidelines so they can find and organize the necessary information for their performance reviews.
While some employees may be able to quickly recall their greatest accomplishments or possess enough self-awareness to easily identify their weaknesses, others may need more assistance. By outlining your expectations, you can help ensure team members complete a thorough and effective self-evaluation.
Here are six things you can ask employees to keep in mind as they reflect on their performance:
1. Be specific
It’s important that employees provide exact facts and figures whenever possible and stay away from vague statements like, “I met my sales quota” or “I provided a positive customer experience,” which don’t provide clear insight into performance. Instead, they should cite precise numbers based on the metrics your team or organization considers most valuable.
Self-assessment example:“I consistently exceeded my monthly sales quota by an average of 18% and finished the quarter at $20,000 over my target revenue goal.”
2. Set aside plenty of time
Managers should give employees a due date and parameters for their self-evaluation several weeks in advance. This will ensure team members have sufficient time to review their work and gather all the necessary data and examples. In most cases, employees need more than a few days to track down information and reflect on their various strengths and weaknesses.
3. Review the job description
If employees aren’t sure what to evaluate, their job description is a good place to start. This will help team members identify which duties they’ve excelled in, skills they’ve enhanced and job functions they could do better. If an employee is interested in earning a promotion, they may find it helpful to review the job description of the role they want to determine whether or not they’re qualified — and if they aren’t, how they can begin building the necessary skills and experience.
4. Make connections to organizational goals
To help employees communicate their value, it’s crucial for them to demonstrate how their efforts and achievements contributed towards company objectives. This is especially important for team members who want to make a case for a promotion or salary increase.
Self-assessment example:“This year, ABC Company has been focused on increasing client retention. At the end of Q2, I built and launched an email win-back campaign that influenced $50,000 in sales from lost customers and another $25,000 in sales from current customers in Q3 alone.”
5. Use the STAR method
Suggest that employees use the STAR method when writing their self-evaluations to demonstrate the impact of their work. With this method, employees briefly describe the Situation or Task, the Action they took to accomplish it and the Results they achieved. This simple framework for structuring a self-assessment highlights the specific action the employee took (not the team as a whole) and what the final outcome of their contribution was.
6. Define next steps
While much of a self-performance review focuses on looking backward and reflecting on top achievements, this is also a great opportunity to set goals and intentions for the future. Employees should finish their evaluation by sharing how they’ll apply their strengths to improve outcomes while also identifying how they’ll improve upon weaknesses through skill-building, education and adopting better habits.
It can also be helpful to ask employees to keep a log of their achievements throughout the year and record each time they meet a goal or perform above expectations. This way, when it comes time for self-evaluations, they’ll have a ready-made list and won’t forget any crucial accomplishments.
Related:Employee Self-Reviews: Effective Tactics to Try
Self-evaluation examples
Here are a few self evaluation for performance review examples that implement the tips above:
Customer service representative
Field 2 Evaluation Tools
“In the past year as a customer service representative for ABC Company, I’ve increased my customer satisfaction rate 37%. Because I know efficiency has been increasingly critical to the organization, I’ve worked hard to memorize frequently asked questions, which helped me reduce my hold time by 20%.
After reflecting on my performance, I noticed that while my ability to build rapport with customers helps me maintain my favorable customer satisfaction ranking, I tend to make calls last longer than they should. By decreasing my talk time by 15 seconds per call, I believe I can increase my call-per-hour rate by at least 10% next quarter without negatively impacting customer satisfaction.
After my previous performance review, I began serving as a trainee mentor and assisted in onboarding nine new representatives, all of whom finished their first quarter above goal. Given this experience and my commitment to improving, I would like to discuss a potential promotion to Customer Service Team Leader.”
Marketing manager
“After taking time to evaluate my performance, I would like to highlight a few of my best achievements from the past quarter. At the beginning of the period, I spearheaded the launch of our organization’s first industry research report. My promotional efforts helped secure a speaking engagement for the CMO at two national conferences, which will help the company meet its annual objective of increasing industry exposure. Additionally, I assisted in overhauling our paid search program and helped procure and onboard a new data partner. As a result, our paid search efforts’ ROI has increased by 120% year over year and influenced $6 million in sales of our newest service line.
This quarter, I noticed that I haven’t been delegating enough work to junior members of the team. Passing more projects to the marketing coordinators will help me become more efficient while also providing them more opportunities for skill building and career development. Additionally, I believe meeting with the sales managers bi-weekly instead of monthly will help improve cross-department communication and ensure marketing campaigns are better aligned with the sales departments’ goals.
Destiny 2 Field Evaluation
By the end of next quarter, my goal is to improve my knowledge of UX/UI practices by taking an online training session. I’ve been working more closely with the UX/UI team in the past few months and want to be able to collaborate more effectively to achieve our team’s goals.”
Software engineer
“I work hard to maintain a positive attitude, even during challenging projects and stressful circumstances. After I completed the massive bug fix in July, the chief product officer commended me for maintaining a calm demeanor, which he said helped keep the rest of the team focused and on-task. I also represented ABC Company at a hackathon this summer and attended a networking event where I helped the company secure two new clients.
In terms of areas for improvement, I’ve recognized the need to increase my time management skills. I’ve started using time tracking software to help me identify inefficiencies throughout my workday. I’ve already raised my efficiency rate by 17%.
Field 2 Evaluation Tool
In terms of professional development, I’d like to take on more managerial or mentorship responsibilities in my day-to-day work. Next quarter, I plan on taking organizational psychology and emotional intelligence courses to learn more about setting goals, managing expectations and what motivates people.”
Self-evaluations are critical to helping employees become aware of their strengths and weaknesses and more committed to their career development. By using these tips and self assessment examples, you can begin developing an effective self-assessment process as part of your company’s performance evaluations.
Related Articles: